![]() The Reface CP won't have latency issues when playing live or using a hardware multitrack.īoth Lounge Lizard and the Reface seem to be monotimbral, though you could presumably spin up a second instance of Lounge Lizard if you need both Rhodes and Wurlitzer in the same song. Lounge Lizard EP-4 now runs in native 64-bit on Mac OS X and Windows making it compatible with the latest sequencers. It will also still work if you migrate to Linux, iOS, or Android, whereas Lounge Lizard is apparently stuck in 2003 and still only supports Windows and Mac. NEW Native 64-bit Audio Unit (AU) and VST Plug-Ins. You can attach the Reface CP to as many computers as you like without it throwing a shitfit over licensing. The Reface CP does not have the godawful challenge-response copy protection system (one reason I dropped Lounge Lizard like a hot potato) and will keep working after AAS go bankrupt or turn off the activation server. Lounge Lizard's physical model cannot do any of these instruments. The Reface CP has a clavinet, toy piano, CP80 piano and the secret acoustic piano. Native 64-bit Audio Unit (AU) and VST Plug-Ins Lounge Lizard EP-4 now runs in native 64-bit on Mac OS X and Windows making it compatible with the latest. ![]() With the Reface CP, you have to manually turn or switch the controls to change sound, which gets old really fast if you program songs via MIDI sequencing. Lounge Lizard supports presets, and will respect the Program Change command via MIDI. If you are working entirely in-the-box a VST will obviously not require the extra audio interface channels which a hardware synth will.Īs a physical modelling engine, Lounge Lizard should have an endless velocity curve, whereas the Reface will depend on how many velocity layers they sampled. Lounge Lizard EP-4 is the recreation of classic electric pianos and delivers the authentic tone of the originals, while also preserving their action and. Lounge Lizard is cheaper, and also allows you to alter the parameters of its physical model to modify or create new pianos which do not physically exist - the Reface is just sample playback so it cannot do this. So given that I'm working off old information, these are the advantages of each: ![]() I've not used Lounge Lizard since 1.0, but I'm not seeing any major differences in version 4. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |